Saturday, October 16, 2010

Brazilian Wax Koh San

Democratic drift in Saguenay, whose fault? Neither Indian nor


Heat stroke of Mayor Tremblay

Saguenay Mayor loses it and rebuffed a reporter for Radio-Canada, which would have pushed a bit too hard in her office! Reasons cited by the chief magistrate of the city, the journalist who met him at his office in the People's House as part of the issue of public interest "The Bill" would have happened ... with "some very well prepared for the city look bad. " At its very epidermal reaction to hand the bearer of the microphone in his place, it is clear that the Mayor did not appreciate at all that the caller is returned with tainted records Loblaws, BTF and Bertrand Girard, three sharp stones that it drags along with many others in his patent leather shoes and whose story will remind him well! Honestly! Can we, in a healthy democracy, where intelligence and wit prevail, blame a journalist for being too ... well prepared to do its job? The answer is obvious ...

Notice therefore to journalists who intend to meet the mayor of Saguenay soon to hold him accountable on his way to administer public affairs. If you want to leave his office on two legs with all your dignity and be free of libel (because the mayor has threatened to get tough with this ultimate channel cons journalists RC which contravenes the law on public information passed by the National Assembly). If you want to pass the test of a good interview docile pupil, you should instead raise the tax rate which in his opinion compares admirably to other merged cities of Quebec must not omit to place in your list of accolades the pier which, indeed, fulfills part of the void left by the demise of the pulp mill in Port Alfred, you still need to raise the relevance of the renovation of two plants of the river Chicoutimi who will win dividend of $ significant to our city and especially it is important not to forget the five car he commandeered for "people first" next to the entrance of our town hall, where the citizen gets to go pay his taxes and fines. Whether we like it or

not the type of management of Mayor Tremblay, who force us to recognize, the wick has become shorter since his arrival at City Hall in November 1997, we must admit that these days our chief magistrate did not need a journalist too well prepared (sic) to look bad in his town that he improperly confounded with his own image. It also symbolizes the relentlessness that Mayor Tremblay deployed to express his Catholic faith before the Bouchard-Taylor ignoring the fact that all citizens of Saguenay do not necessarily share their faith and have more than one been humbled to see and represent. It was only rehashing history classes patronized it has served us for years to community television. One need only see how was warped and perverted the consultation-canister concocted by City Hall on the construction of an auditorium at Chicoutimi. And it was only remember the completely absurd statement that Mayor Tremblay made last year, the Salon du Livre de Jonquière, where he was guest speaker against the sustainability of traditional books, while publishers and authors before the francophones are struggling Internet fear the arrival of the electronic book.



Democratic deficit and municipal Parlementeries


In my case, heat stroke Mayor Tremblay and his way to react very temperamental opposition that is trying to show somehow through some media, do not make me a shadow of a fold on the left buttock! If the mayor Tremblay wants to make a fool of him, too bad for him, he will deserve what is coming inevitably! But the mayor Tremblay used the pretext of the image of the city to justify its behavior against juveniles to everyone, it bothers me to the first title because I am in this city and I do not like that you take me hostage and neither for nor a buffoon.

What bothers me, in the first chicane in this protracted and falsely leads to nothing good for all citizens, is to see the ultimate and unchallenged place that today is elected on the municipal political scene. It is understood that if this whole place is first and foremost because the political machinery designed to prevent the sorts of excesses are not working ... or rather do not work! And what interests me in this regard is to understand the whys of this democratic failure never ceases to fester and to debilitate??

But where have all the citizens?

How is it the aldermen, however, elected from the perspective of balancing the democratic forces in the presence and with a specific code of laws based on the 175-year history of our municipal system, have become so ineffective today, also absent the public policy debate, as useless when it comes time to oppose the dictates of one who struts, scapular neck and crucifix in hand, standard-bearer of the Democratic municipal control it like a little King of Junk? How did we get here? Whose fault is of such a drift? If the problem is there, real, and it is easy to pinpoint the troublemaker who does not lack for a shine in his way, the answer is less obvious. It brings us back to that place the citizen recitals, as individual corporate and democratic institutions which we have, in the heart of the matter.

Could it be that having created a class of professional magistrates (sic) that cling like leeches to their position for five, six or seven terms, there is something to do? This problem, could we not pay at the next election? How is it that some media, I will not name, were so attentive an ear to the mayor, while others have trouble with him? Could it be that the media, the more complacent and more malleable, thrive with the funds of the city as a reward, while others, less complacent and less malleable, receive only the crumbs in punishment? Could be that the press, spoken or written, is not completely pure in this regard? How is it that people do not react more effectively in public debate? Should we blame in this regard, poverty remarks that reflect some of the regulars period questions Monday at City Hall?

In the present state of affairs, since the gnashing of teeth no longer have any impact on subsequent events, why not laugh while we can still do? Why not a "Parlementeries" City that would allow us to illustrate the roles played by each actor and to make people aware that in a democracy, everyone has a role to play and that it is through commitment and effort that can cause all the desired changes.

akakia

0 comments:

Post a Comment